Skip to main content

How easily to remember the different layers in OSI Reference Model?

How easily to remember the different layers in OSI Reference Model?

Whilst posting about "An easy way to remember Rahu Kalam", I just recalled about a simple and a similar sentence that we learnt during college days to remember the different layers in Computer Networks. It was a book titled "Computer Networks" by Andrew S. Tanenbaum that was prescribed for the syllabus.

The simple sentence was 'Please Do Not Throw Sausage Pizza Away'. Now we can remember the following layers simply:

  1. Physical
  2. Data Link
  3. Network
  4. Transport
  5. Session
  6. Presentation
  7. Application

When I did a quick Internet Search of this statement itself, I just got a few more interesting sentences to make one remember the seven layers. Check it out here from TcpIp guide website.

Comments

RRave said…
Dear Friend,
I don't know this is correct place to put this message, anyhow, I'm just writing, if you are think is it's wrong please ignore.You are articles are nice and excellent concept. I would like to invite to newly launched .NET Programming website the codegain.com on 1st of this June 2009. Currently CodeGain has more than 450 articles within the a month under the followings categories C#, VB.NET,ASP.NET,WPF,WCF,WFF,LINQ,SilverLight, AJAX, JQuery, JavaScript, Sql Servers , Oracle and more. To more list of categories visit the http://www.codegain.com. I have seen you are writing greatest article to web portal, I’m kindly asking you publish your article in codegain.com also and support to grow the CodeGain share this with your friends also. I am expecting good response from you. You can contact me using info@codegain.com.

Thank you
RRaveen
codegain.com
kamalam said…
if we are going to do good things we need to avoid ragukalam and yamkandam no need to bother about kulikalam.

kulikalam timings refer to death,funeral etc

Popular posts from this blog

Google NCR

Google NCRMost of you would be knowing about this trick in navigating to Google generic website. But I just came to know only a few days before and hence thought I would share the information with others too.
Whenever you type http://www.google.com/, Google automatically tries to redirect you to your country-specific website. For me, it always redirects to http://www.google.co.in/ (Google India). But when we specifically want to navigate to Google Generic website for some reason, there are two ways to accomplish the same.Click the 'Go to Google.com' link at the bottom of the webpage that is displayed from http://www.google.co.in/To prevent this redundant click, you can opt to type http://www.google.com/ncr/ which would prevent the redirect from happening. The NCR stands for No Country Redirect. There is a brief discussion about this NCR over this forum.You may also like to check out Google help documentation regarding the country redirections from here.

Elegant 'MailTo' Replacement

Elegant 'MailTo' Replacement

MailTo tags have become a bane to all websites since spammers run spam robots which crawl the web to capture the email addresses, add to their catalogs and send spams to them. I just thought of sharing with others a simple JavaScript function which would trigger open the default email client instead of having mailto: embedded in the HTML Page.

Just have the following function included in your webpage

<script language='Javascript'>
function WriteMailTo(user,domain)
{
location.replace ('mailto:'+user+'@'+domain);
}
</script>

And whereever you want to invoke the mailto, just called WriteMailTo('user','example.com') and the user's default email client should be launching (if configured) without any hassles.

Elegant Encryption Routine

Elegant Encryption Routine

Securing information from prying eyes has always been a concern of a project architect. The perils waiting to prey on an unsecured information is aplenty. .NET comes with it a vast amount of rich Cryptography libraries. Now the next problem that confronts an architect is:Which algorithm to choose?What is the strength of encryption to use?In future, if algorithm or strength changes, how easy and flexible is the implementation?I have been trying out various encryption logic and then I came across a library called XCrypt from CodeProject.  I feel that this is a very good feature-rich wrapper of .NET Cryptography API. Also, there are implementations for algorithms like BlowFish, which does not have API in .NET BCL. It also comes with a rich Windows application that helps us troubleshoot encryption and decryption with specific keys in a easy way. Let us thank pdwolf for the really excellent encryption library.Free 3D Marine Aquarium Screensaver - Watch dolphins, s…